<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GraceConversation.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graceconversation.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graceconversation.com</link>
	<description>GraceConversation.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Falling from Grace: The Meaning of &#8220;Faith&#8221; by source</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/08/17/falling-from-grace-the-meaning-of-faith/#comment-17852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[source]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=462#comment-17852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you given any kind of consideration at all with translating your main website in to French? I know a couple of of translaters here that would help you do it for free if you wanna get in touch with me personally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you given any kind of consideration at all with translating your main website in to French? I know a couple of of translaters here that would help you do it for free if you wanna get in touch with me personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Imperfect Obedience and Disobedience by Mieszkania Gocław</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/17/imperfect-obedience-and-disobedience/#comment-15462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mieszkania Gocław]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=343#comment-15462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! &quot;A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it.&quot; by Oscar Fingall O&#039;Flahertie Wills Wilde.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! &#8220;A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it.&#8221; by Oscar Fingall O&#8217;Flahertie Wills Wilde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apostasy Lists by Leaders Among Conservative Churches of Christ by Ron chandler</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/04/24/apostasy-lists-by-leaders-among-conservative-churches-of-christ/#comment-14591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron chandler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=148#comment-14591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the list looks like this:

Buddhism
Islam
New Ageism
Agnosticism
Hindu
Judaism

Would it be wrong to at least draw lines this way? Or does anything go?  If it&#039;s ok to draw these lines, why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the list looks like this:</p>
<p>Buddhism<br />
Islam<br />
New Ageism<br />
Agnosticism<br />
Hindu<br />
Judaism</p>
<p>Would it be wrong to at least draw lines this way? Or does anything go?  If it&#8217;s ok to draw these lines, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposition One: Doctrinal error can lead to eternal damnation, by Phil Sanders by -</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/04/02/proposition-one-doctrinal-error-can-lead-to-eternal-damnation/#comment-12148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[-]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=59#comment-12148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pleasant content! I?d wish to loose time waiting for you subsequent article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pleasant content! I?d wish to loose time waiting for you subsequent article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discipline: The member who is struggling to repent by UndeniablyGod Blogspot</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/08/23/discipline-the-member-who-is-struggling-to-repent/#comment-11940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UndeniablyGod Blogspot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=500#comment-11940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Guin. Thanks for your article. I referenced it on my blog site:

http://undeniablygod.blogspot.com/

Hope you don&#039;t mind...God bless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Guin. Thanks for your article. I referenced it on my blog site:</p>
<p><a href="http://undeniablygod.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://undeniablygod.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind&#8230;God bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac’s Response To Todd’s And Jay’s Answers: Part 1 by mieszkanie</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/01/mac%e2%80%99s-response-to-todd%e2%80%99s-and-jay%e2%80%99s-answers-part-1/#comment-10853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mieszkanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=284#comment-10853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anywhere, when i read this piece of writing i thought i could also make comment due to this brilliant article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anywhere, when i read this piece of writing i thought i could also make comment due to this brilliant article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faith, Works, and Obedience by Ken Sublett</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/17/faith-works-and-obedience/#comment-9608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Sublett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=347#comment-9608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justification does not mean salvation: a justified person is one who is ceremonially qualified to appeal to God to give him a good conscience or A holy spirit.  Peter was told that even pigs were purified by &quot;the faith of Jesus Christ.&quot;  I may be the best lawyer in the world but I do not have the standing to make a request to the Supreme Court. A citizen had to have the standing to appeal to the courts of that time and ask that his sentence be commuted.

Acts 10:35 But in every nation 
he that feareth him, 
and worketh righteousness, 
is accepted with him.

&lt;b&gt;Liddell and Scott
Dikai-ôma , atos, to, act of right, opp. adikêma, prop. amendment of a wrong, opp. dikaiopragêma, 
b. justification, plea of right, c. pl., pleadings, documents in a suit,  etc.; also, credentials

dikai-ōsis , eōs, h(,
A. setting right, doing justice to: hence,
1. condemnation, punishment, Th.8.66, D.C.40.43 (pl.), cj. in Plu.2.421d.
2. plea of legal right, justification, Lys.9.8, cf. Harp.
3. making or accounting righteous, justification, Ep.Rom.4.25, etc.
II. demand of right or as of right, just claim, Th.1.141, Plu.Demetr.18.
III. judgement of what is right, antēllaxan tē dikaiōsei altered at their will and pleasure, Th.3.82.&lt;/b&gt;

But, Peter told Cornelius what to do to be &quot;saved&quot;: be baptized.

We are washed in water INTO the Word or into the School of Jesus Christ.  He was identified as a SON only after he had been baptized as an act of submission.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justification does not mean salvation: a justified person is one who is ceremonially qualified to appeal to God to give him a good conscience or A holy spirit.  Peter was told that even pigs were purified by &#8220;the faith of Jesus Christ.&#8221;  I may be the best lawyer in the world but I do not have the standing to make a request to the Supreme Court. A citizen had to have the standing to appeal to the courts of that time and ask that his sentence be commuted.</p>
<p>Acts 10:35 But in every nation<br />
he that feareth him,<br />
and worketh righteousness,<br />
is accepted with him.</p>
<p><b>Liddell and Scott<br />
Dikai-ôma , atos, to, act of right, opp. adikêma, prop. amendment of a wrong, opp. dikaiopragêma,<br />
b. justification, plea of right, c. pl., pleadings, documents in a suit,  etc.; also, credentials</p>
<p>dikai-ōsis , eōs, h(,<br />
A. setting right, doing justice to: hence,<br />
1. condemnation, punishment, Th.8.66, D.C.40.43 (pl.), cj. in Plu.2.421d.<br />
2. plea of legal right, justification, Lys.9.8, cf. Harp.<br />
3. making or accounting righteous, justification, Ep.Rom.4.25, etc.<br />
II. demand of right or as of right, just claim, Th.1.141, Plu.Demetr.18.<br />
III. judgement of what is right, antēllaxan tē dikaiōsei altered at their will and pleasure, Th.3.82.</b></p>
<p>But, Peter told Cornelius what to do to be &#8220;saved&#8221;: be baptized.</p>
<p>We are washed in water INTO the Word or into the School of Jesus Christ.  He was identified as a SON only after he had been baptized as an act of submission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faith, Works, and Obedience by Ken Sublett</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/17/faith-works-and-obedience/#comment-9607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Sublett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=347#comment-9607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter says that &quot;Baptism saves.&quot;  The reason baptism saves is according to Peter is our way of REQUESTING from God A good conscience or A holy spirit. That is conversion (2 Cor 3) which permits the baptized to read black text on brown paper.

We are washed with water INTO THE WORD or into the School of Jesus Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter says that &#8220;Baptism saves.&#8221;  The reason baptism saves is according to Peter is our way of REQUESTING from God A good conscience or A holy spirit. That is conversion (2 Cor 3) which permits the baptized to read black text on brown paper.</p>
<p>We are washed with water INTO THE WORD or into the School of Jesus Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Falling from Grace: The Meaning of &#8220;Faith&#8221; by Ken Sublett</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/08/17/falling-from-grace-the-meaning-of-faith/#comment-9606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Sublett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=462#comment-9606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys cannot tell the difference between Justification or Righteousness, and salvation and regeneration. 

The angelic voice told peter that PIGS were not impure: surely a gentile is pure in a ceremonial sense. Nevertheless, Cornelius wanted to be told words by which he might be SAVED: Peter commanded him to be baptized.

If a person is justified they have the &quot;legal standing&quot; to request A good conscience or A holy spirit from God. That REQUEST is only avaliable to the &quot;pistis&quot; or those who COMPLY with the direct command..

Believeth not is &quot;apistos&quot; which means &quot;NO, I will NOT COMPLY.&quot; That is why Christ first stated in Isaiah1 and fulfilled it in Mark 16: those who REFUSE TO COMPLY are automatically weeded out as one of those God ordained Jesus to seek out and saved.

&lt;b&gt;Liddell and Scott
Dikai-ôma , atos, to, act of right, opp. adikêma, prop. amendment of a wrong, opp. dikaiopragêma, 
b. justification, plea of right, c. pl., pleadings, documents in a suit,  etc.; also, credentials

dikai-ōsis , eōs, h(,
A. setting right, doing justice to: hence,
1. condemnation, punishment, Th.8.66, D.C.40.43 (pl.), cj. in Plu.2.421d.
2. plea of legal right, justification, Lys.9.8, cf. Harp.
3. making or accounting righteous, justification, Ep.Rom.4.25, etc.
II. demand of right or as of right, just claim, Th.1.141, Plu.Demetr.18.
III. judgement of what is right, antēllaxan tē dikaiōsei altered at their will and pleasure, Th.3.82.&lt;/b&gt;

I know from all recorded history that &quot;religious performers&quot; had a a gender problem which qualified them to be priests, preachers or witchdoctors.  I wonder out loud if that is not a problem with people who cannot tolerate being contradicted by the Bible. Karen Amrstrong in A History of God said that Amos spoke of people too effeminate to dialog with God.  There is no command to SING you know.

I know that &quot;being ready to give an answer to ANYONE who asks&quot; especially if you set yourself up as an authority was left as a mark. Pride manifests the &quot;Lucifer Principle.&quot; You know, Christ identified him/her/it as a singing and harp-playing prostitute in the Garden of Eden. Serpent is not a snake but a Musical Enchanter(ess). You know, not even Judas knew his controller until Jesus MARKED him with the SOP word: Sop and Psallo have the same root meaning.

I feel lots of pity that grown people could be so diverted from the truth that they would deliberately sow discord among brothers--or father and son where the son is not qualified either.  The poor preachers on the &quot;conservative&quot; side cannot read the text either because they corrupt the Word meaning &quot;selling learning at retail.&quot; The same word in Greek and Latin also identified prostitutes: anyone who would SELL their body in any form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys cannot tell the difference between Justification or Righteousness, and salvation and regeneration. </p>
<p>The angelic voice told peter that PIGS were not impure: surely a gentile is pure in a ceremonial sense. Nevertheless, Cornelius wanted to be told words by which he might be SAVED: Peter commanded him to be baptized.</p>
<p>If a person is justified they have the &#8220;legal standing&#8221; to request A good conscience or A holy spirit from God. That REQUEST is only avaliable to the &#8220;pistis&#8221; or those who COMPLY with the direct command..</p>
<p>Believeth not is &#8220;apistos&#8221; which means &#8220;NO, I will NOT COMPLY.&#8221; That is why Christ first stated in Isaiah1 and fulfilled it in Mark 16: those who REFUSE TO COMPLY are automatically weeded out as one of those God ordained Jesus to seek out and saved.</p>
<p><b>Liddell and Scott<br />
Dikai-ôma , atos, to, act of right, opp. adikêma, prop. amendment of a wrong, opp. dikaiopragêma,<br />
b. justification, plea of right, c. pl., pleadings, documents in a suit,  etc.; also, credentials</p>
<p>dikai-ōsis , eōs, h(,<br />
A. setting right, doing justice to: hence,<br />
1. condemnation, punishment, Th.8.66, D.C.40.43 (pl.), cj. in Plu.2.421d.<br />
2. plea of legal right, justification, Lys.9.8, cf. Harp.<br />
3. making or accounting righteous, justification, Ep.Rom.4.25, etc.<br />
II. demand of right or as of right, just claim, Th.1.141, Plu.Demetr.18.<br />
III. judgement of what is right, antēllaxan tē dikaiōsei altered at their will and pleasure, Th.3.82.</b></p>
<p>I know from all recorded history that &#8220;religious performers&#8221; had a a gender problem which qualified them to be priests, preachers or witchdoctors.  I wonder out loud if that is not a problem with people who cannot tolerate being contradicted by the Bible. Karen Amrstrong in A History of God said that Amos spoke of people too effeminate to dialog with God.  There is no command to SING you know.</p>
<p>I know that &#8220;being ready to give an answer to ANYONE who asks&#8221; especially if you set yourself up as an authority was left as a mark. Pride manifests the &#8220;Lucifer Principle.&#8221; You know, Christ identified him/her/it as a singing and harp-playing prostitute in the Garden of Eden. Serpent is not a snake but a Musical Enchanter(ess). You know, not even Judas knew his controller until Jesus MARKED him with the SOP word: Sop and Psallo have the same root meaning.</p>
<p>I feel lots of pity that grown people could be so diverted from the truth that they would deliberately sow discord among brothers&#8211;or father and son where the son is not qualified either.  The poor preachers on the &#8220;conservative&#8221; side cannot read the text either because they corrupt the Word meaning &#8220;selling learning at retail.&#8221; The same word in Greek and Latin also identified prostitutes: anyone who would SELL their body in any form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catching Up by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/04/08/catching-up/#comment-6693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=82#comment-6693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hypocrisy is in the fact that anyone who denies the necessity of obedience, will say one must believe  and do something to be saved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypocrisy is in the fact that anyone who denies the necessity of obedience, will say one must believe  and do something to be saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

