<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Incoherence of the Conservative Position, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/</link>
	<description>GraceConversation.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:14:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Angelo Joyce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Angelo Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another question:

What does it mean &quot;whoremongers and adulterers God will judge?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question:</p>
<p>What does it mean &#8220;whoremongers and adulterers God will judge?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Angelo Joyce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Angelo Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I am not here claiming that I understand totally the long-suffering of God or every facet of his grace and mercy.  Nor do I have a comprehensive list of sins (for as Mac noted earlier the NT does not give such).  However, I do know that there are some things which God condemn a man over (Gal 5:19-21; 1 Cor 6:9-11).  It is not possible to get around the import of what Paul said in those verses.  Nor, do I intend to defend the &quot;conservative position&quot; but the bible.  There are some things and people from which we are to withdraw ourselves, therefore the must be some way in determining whether a given thing is damnable or not; otherwise those verses have absolutely no meaning for any intelligent reader.

I look forward to some of the responses, as fellowship, has always interested me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I am not here claiming that I understand totally the long-suffering of God or every facet of his grace and mercy.  Nor do I have a comprehensive list of sins (for as Mac noted earlier the NT does not give such).  However, I do know that there are some things which God condemn a man over (Gal 5:19-21; 1 Cor 6:9-11).  It is not possible to get around the import of what Paul said in those verses.  Nor, do I intend to defend the &#8220;conservative position&#8221; but the bible.  There are some things and people from which we are to withdraw ourselves, therefore the must be some way in determining whether a given thing is damnable or not; otherwise those verses have absolutely no meaning for any intelligent reader.</p>
<p>I look forward to some of the responses, as fellowship, has always interested me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Angelo Joyce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Angelo Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please try and answer each question with an answer and not dodge and pose other questions, that does very little to my understand of the truth.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please try and answer each question with an answer and not dodge and pose other questions, that does very little to my understand of the truth.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Angelo Joyce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Angelo Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello again all,

Questions:

How long had Nadab and Abihu been priests before they were killed in service (Leviticus 10:1-2)?

How long had Ananias and Sapphira been Christian&#039;s before they were killed by God (Acts 5)

How long was Simon a Christian before he was rebuked by Peter?

What does it mean that &quot;your money perish with you&quot; can one perish and be saved?

What does &quot;your heart is not right before God&quot;--can our hearts be wrong with God and we still be in his love? 

What does &quot;therefore repent of this wickedness of yours mean-- was he saved in his wickedness?&quot;

Why was Simon told to &quot;pray to the Lord that he may perhaps forgive you for the intent of your heart.--he only had an incorrect intent; does this mean incorrect intentions (such as this one) can cause one to be lost?

Is one who is &quot;in bondage to sin&quot; under condemnation? (consider carefully Romans 6-8, those who walk after the Spirit have no condemnation but those who walk after the flesh do 8:1-4)

Was Simon walking after the flesh or after the Spirit? 

Simon immediately asked for prayer (he showed penitence) does that mean he was not in a condemned state because he quickly repented?

What is the difference between Simon sliding back into sin shortly after his conversion and the two who were in sexual immorality and immediately repented?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again all,</p>
<p>Questions:</p>
<p>How long had Nadab and Abihu been priests before they were killed in service (Leviticus 10:1-2)?</p>
<p>How long had Ananias and Sapphira been Christian&#8217;s before they were killed by God (Acts 5)</p>
<p>How long was Simon a Christian before he was rebuked by Peter?</p>
<p>What does it mean that &#8220;your money perish with you&#8221; can one perish and be saved?</p>
<p>What does &#8220;your heart is not right before God&#8221;&#8211;can our hearts be wrong with God and we still be in his love? </p>
<p>What does &#8220;therefore repent of this wickedness of yours mean&#8211; was he saved in his wickedness?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why was Simon told to &#8220;pray to the Lord that he may perhaps forgive you for the intent of your heart.&#8211;he only had an incorrect intent; does this mean incorrect intentions (such as this one) can cause one to be lost?</p>
<p>Is one who is &#8220;in bondage to sin&#8221; under condemnation? (consider carefully Romans 6-8, those who walk after the Spirit have no condemnation but those who walk after the flesh do 8:1-4)</p>
<p>Was Simon walking after the flesh or after the Spirit? </p>
<p>Simon immediately asked for prayer (he showed penitence) does that mean he was not in a condemned state because he quickly repented?</p>
<p>What is the difference between Simon sliding back into sin shortly after his conversion and the two who were in sexual immorality and immediately repented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randall</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the post it there is a suggestion that Alexancer Campbell was a pre-millenial: &quot;But Wallace was surely a factious man! He ran many congregations entirely out of the Churches of Christ over this doctrine — a doctrine that had been held by Alexander Campbell (who published a periodical named The Millennial Harbinger!), James A. Harding, and David Lipscomb.&quot;

I believe Alexander Campbell was a post-millenialist and that Lipscomb and Harding may have been pre-mils.  The distintion is of some importatnce though Wallace may have been put out just as much with either of the positions.

Apparently Alex. Campbell believed his work/movement was actually the harbinger of the millenium or the golden age of the church during which the church would rule on earth (while Jesus was in heaven) for a long time, though not necessarily a literal 1,000 years.  In the pre-mil view Jesus reigns on earth for 1,000 years followed by the final rebellion and then the eternal abode.  I wonder what A. Campbell would think of how the movement has shattered?

Of note, I have heard Foy Wallace Jr. had been a pre-mil earlier in his life and then changed his mind and attacked the pre-mils in a rather mean spirited manner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the post it there is a suggestion that Alexancer Campbell was a pre-millenial: &#8220;But Wallace was surely a factious man! He ran many congregations entirely out of the Churches of Christ over this doctrine — a doctrine that had been held by Alexander Campbell (who published a periodical named The Millennial Harbinger!), James A. Harding, and David Lipscomb.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe Alexander Campbell was a post-millenialist and that Lipscomb and Harding may have been pre-mils.  The distintion is of some importatnce though Wallace may have been put out just as much with either of the positions.</p>
<p>Apparently Alex. Campbell believed his work/movement was actually the harbinger of the millenium or the golden age of the church during which the church would rule on earth (while Jesus was in heaven) for a long time, though not necessarily a literal 1,000 years.  In the pre-mil view Jesus reigns on earth for 1,000 years followed by the final rebellion and then the eternal abode.  I wonder what A. Campbell would think of how the movement has shattered?</p>
<p>Of note, I have heard Foy Wallace Jr. had been a pre-mil earlier in his life and then changed his mind and attacked the pre-mils in a rather mean spirited manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laymond</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laymond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Royce, did you not read Luke 15, about the lost sheep,or coin, better yet the wayward son. 

Lk:15:18: I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,

The sheep and the coin had to be searched for and brought back, the wayward child had to find his way back, but he was welcomed by a loving father just as a wayward Christian who would surly be lost if they did nor repent, and come home. I don&#039;t see any rebirth here, just realizing you want to come home.
Whether you believe it or not, there are times when you have to put forth some effort, some showing that you want the inheritances offered by your father. It will nor be forced upon you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Royce, did you not read Luke 15, about the lost sheep,or coin, better yet the wayward son. </p>
<p>Lk:15:18: I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,</p>
<p>The sheep and the coin had to be searched for and brought back, the wayward child had to find his way back, but he was welcomed by a loving father just as a wayward Christian who would surly be lost if they did nor repent, and come home. I don&#8217;t see any rebirth here, just realizing you want to come home.<br />
Whether you believe it or not, there are times when you have to put forth some effort, some showing that you want the inheritances offered by your father. It will nor be forced upon you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Royce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan,

I think you might want to read again what I said and asked. Thanks for your comments though.

Royce]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I think you might want to read again what I said and asked. Thanks for your comments though.</p>
<p>Royce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Royce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jay for your rapid fire response!

I will read the linked material a.s.a.p., likely tomorrow a.m. I have a house full of grand sons right now.

Love and respect,
Royce]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jay for your rapid fire response!</p>
<p>I will read the linked material a.s.a.p., likely tomorrow a.m. I have a house full of grand sons right now.</p>
<p>Love and respect,<br />
Royce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Guin</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Guin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Royce,

Those are very insightful questions. I offered my answers to them in my book The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace, beginning at page 69. http://jayguin.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/the-holy-spirit-and-revolutionary-grace.pdf

Although the questions are very pertinent to the conversation here, it&#039;s not time to answer them here yet.

But the short answer is I pretty much agree with you -- but that has to be understood in the larger context, that being how very broad God&#039;s grace is. 

I took up the same questions from a different angle at these posts:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/11/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 1&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/14/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved-part-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 2&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/14/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved-part-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 3&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Royce,</p>
<p>Those are very insightful questions. I offered my answers to them in my book The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace, beginning at page 69. <a href="http://jayguin.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/the-holy-spirit-and-revolutionary-grace.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://jayguin.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/the-holy-spirit-and-revolutionary-grace.pdf</a></p>
<p>Although the questions are very pertinent to the conversation here, it&#8217;s not time to answer them here yet.</p>
<p>But the short answer is I pretty much agree with you &#8212; but that has to be understood in the larger context, that being how very broad God&#8217;s grace is. </p>
<p>I took up the same questions from a different angle at these posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/11/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved/" rel="nofollow">Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/14/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved-part-2/" rel="nofollow">Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 2</a></p>
<p><a href="http://oneinjesus.info/2008/02/14/searching-for-the-third-way-once-saved-always-saved-part-3/" rel="nofollow">Once Saved, Always Saved, Part 3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Smith</title>
		<link>http://graceconversation.com/2009/07/13/the-incoherence-of-the-conservative-position-part-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graceconversation.com/?p=320#comment-1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Royce,
One becomes a child of God thru &quot;rebirth.&quot;  He is now a child of God.  Just as nothing my daughter can do that will sever our relationship, neither can a child of God NOT be a child of God.  The Hebrew preacher (10:26,27), clearly showing that one who sins willfully faces &quot;a certain fearful expectation of judgment (condemnation) and a fierceness of fire which will devour the adversaries,&quot; does NOT deny the rebirth, rather recognizes it when he speaks of we &quot;who have received the knowledge of the truth.&quot;

Another rebirth is not possible, only a re-reconciliation thru repentance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Royce,<br />
One becomes a child of God thru &#8220;rebirth.&#8221;  He is now a child of God.  Just as nothing my daughter can do that will sever our relationship, neither can a child of God NOT be a child of God.  The Hebrew preacher (10:26,27), clearly showing that one who sins willfully faces &#8220;a certain fearful expectation of judgment (condemnation) and a fierceness of fire which will devour the adversaries,&#8221; does NOT deny the rebirth, rather recognizes it when he speaks of we &#8220;who have received the knowledge of the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another rebirth is not possible, only a re-reconciliation thru repentance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

